CDLA · Module 3 — Outcomes and authentic assessment
Messick’s fidelity: assessments should resemble the criterion situation — context, complexity, and judgment.
About 17 min
Practice in the lesson player
Sorting, matching, quizzes, and the module gate stay behind a free account so scored answers are not public. The teaching notes below are the same cited curriculum.
01
Authentic assessment asks learners to use knowledge in a context that mirrors real performance. Messick argued validation is about meaning in context — a multiple-choice list of definitions fails fidelity when the job requires diagnosing a fault under time pressure.
02
“Which of these is a benefit of empathy?” can be answered without ever speaking to a customer. Messick’s point is fidelity to the criterion situation: context, complexity, and judgment. The job version is a branching call in the real CRM fields, with an angry customer, a policy constraint, and a time pressure that exists on the floor. A lockout check that asks “Safety is important — true or false” is decorative. Dragging the lockout steps on a labeled schematic is closer, because the learner must perform the order. A gate of five random facts from the module is weak because it samples recall, not because it is short. Length is not the fidelity problem. SCORM can score either design; the choice is yours.
03
Decorative check: Define empathy in one sentence. · True/false: safety matters. · Five facts drawn at random from the slides.
Authentic rehearsal: Choose what to say on a live refund exception. · Lock out the machine from the schematic, in order. · The gate scores that judgment, not the definition.